Leo v. Armington

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Leo v. Armington

59 A.2d 371, 74 R.I. 124, 1948 R.I. LEXIS 54

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMay 25, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 59 A.2d 371 (Leo v. Armington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leo v. Armington, 59 A.2d 371, 74 R.I. 124, 1948 R.I. LEXIS 54 (R.I. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a bill in equity for the construction of the will of Simon W. Wardwell, late of the city of Providence. The cause apparently being ready for hearing for final decree in the superior court was certified to this court for our determination in accordance with the provisions of general laws 1938, chapter 545, §7. An examination of the record, however, discloses that a charitable trust created by the will is involved and may be affected by a final determination of the questions presented, .at least as to the amount that may ultimately be available for charitable purposes; and that the attorney general has not been made a party to this proceeding.

It is well settled in this state that the attorney general is the representative of the interests of the public under *125 charitable trusts and that he should be 'made a party in any suit in which the existence or the validity of such a trust is in question or wherein the administration of such a trust is involved. Newport Hospital v. Harvey, 47 R. I. 382; Powers v. Home for Aged Women, 55 R. I. 187.

Fred Brosco, for complainant. John L. Curran, for respondent trustees, Sherwood & Clifford, Sidney Clifford, for respondents Adelina C. L. Appleton, Catherine S. Meyer and Theresa Shea.'

In our opinion the administration of a charitable trust is involved in the instant cause and the attorney general, in accordance with the rule above stated, should be made a party respondent before we finally determine the cause as certified.

Accordingly the papers in the cause are remanded to the superior court with direction that a suitable order be entered making the attorney general a party respondent and giving him an opportunity to enter an appearance, to file an answer and to take such other steps as he may desire within the times fixed therefor by the superior court; and thereupon that the. cause be recertified under the statute to this court for final determination thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a bill in equity for the construction of the will of Simon W. Wardwell, late of the city of Providence. The cause apparently being ready for hearing for final decree in the superior court was certified to this court for our determination in accordance with the provisions of general laws 1938, chapter 545, §7. An examination of the record, however, discloses that a charitable trust created by the will is involved and may be affected by a final determination of the questions presented, .at least as to the amount that may ultimately be available for charitable purposes; and that the attorney general has not been made a party to this proceeding.

It is well settled in this state that the attorney general is the representative of the interests of the public under *125 charitable trusts and that he should be 'made a party in any suit in which the existence or the validity of such a trust is in question or wherein the administration of such a trust is involved. Newport Hospital v. Harvey, 47 R. I. 382; Powers v. Home for Aged Women, 55 R. I. 187.

Fred Brosco, for complainant. John L. Curran, for respondent trustees, Sherwood & Clifford, Sidney Clifford, for respondents Adelina C. L. Appleton, Catherine S. Meyer and Theresa Shea.'

In our opinion the administration of a charitable trust is involved in the instant cause and the attorney general, in accordance with the rule above stated, should be made a party respondent before we finally determine the cause as certified.

Accordingly the papers in the cause are remanded to the superior court with direction that a suitable order be entered making the attorney general a party respondent and giving him an opportunity to enter an appearance, to file an answer and to take such other steps as he may desire within the times fixed therefor by the superior court; and thereupon that the. cause be recertified under the statute to this court for final determination thereof.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.2d 371, 74 R.I. 124, 1948 R.I. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-v-armington-ri-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack