Leo L. Maddox v. David Odom, Hearing Officer Maria Blandshaw, I.A.C. Staff Coordinator, in Their Official and Individual Capacities

73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4179, 1996 WL 2401

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 4, 1996
• Docket: 95-7019
• Status: Published

Opinion

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Leo L. MADDOX, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David ODOM, Hearing Officer; Maria Blandshaw, I.A.C. Staff
Coordinator, in their official and individual
capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7019.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided: Jan. 4, 1996.

Leo L. Maddox, Appellant Pro Se.

Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Benjamin Davis McCoy, Richardson, Plowden, Grier & Howser, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maddox v. Odom, No. CA-94-1835-3-18BC (D.S.C. June 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED