Leo Gene Hall v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 5, 2007
Docket04-07-00661-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Leo Gene Hall v. State (Leo Gene Hall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leo Gene Hall v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION



No. 04-07-00661-CR



Leo Gene HALL,

Appellant



v.



The STATE of Texas,

Appellee



From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CR-2283

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding



PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 5, 2007



DISMISSED



Defendant Leo Gene Hall pled nolo contendere to possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced within the terms of a plea bargain. Defendant timely filed a notice of appeal. The trial court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal states: "the defendant has waived the right of appeal" and that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk's record contains a written plea bargain and a written waiver of appeal, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant; therefore, the trial court's certification accurately reflects that defendant waived his right to appeal and that defendant's case is a plea bargain case and defendant does not have a right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Rule 25.2(d) provides, "The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, on October 9, 2007, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2003, order); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial court certification has been filed; therefore, this appeal is dismissed.





DO NOT PUBLISH





Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leo Gene Hall v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-gene-hall-v-state-texapp-2007.