Leo Edwin Bromberg v. United States

389 F.2d 618, 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 778
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 1968
Docket21373_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 389 F.2d 618 (Leo Edwin Bromberg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leo Edwin Bromberg v. United States, 389 F.2d 618, 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 778 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal largely centers on an alleged insufficiency of the evidence to justify a conviction of filing a false income tax return for the year 1959.

Looking at the record before us in the light most favorable to the prosecution, as we must on this appeal, the record discloses ample evidence to support the judgment of conviction of knowingly and wilfully filing a false income tax return for the year 1959.

The appellant was admittedly “under pressure” when he made the false return, but was not incompetent; he was an attorney at law with some considerable experience, and held a master’s degree in taxation.

Since the false claims were based upon the false operating loss which appellant claimed on his 1959 tax return, the exclusion of evidence of income and expenses in the years prior and subsequent to the year 1959 was proper, as such evidence was irrelevant and immaterial.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wilson
586 F. Supp. 1011 (S.D. New York, 1984)
United States v. Jack W. Baum
435 F.2d 1197 (Seventh Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 F.2d 618, 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-edwin-bromberg-v-united-states-ca9-1968.