Leo Duboise v. State of North Carolina

338 F.2d 697, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3885
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 16, 1964·No. 9466·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leo DuBoise, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, filed his petition in the court below for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that at the time of his trial he “requested that he be put on the stand in his own behalf” and that his counsel “did not want your petitioner to take the stand in his own behalf.”

The District Court, accepting the factual allegations of the petition as true, concluded that they presented no constitutional question and dismissed the petition without requiring the state to answer and without a hearing.

Following dismissal of his petition, DuBoise addressed to one of the individual judges of this court what purports to be a “Petition for Writ of Certiorari,” appearing in the record on appeal, in which he attempts to allege facts in addition to those alleged in his habeas corpus petition.

We affirm the action of the District Court, without prejudice, however, to petitioner’s right to amend his original petition or file a new petition as he may be advised.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leo Duboise v. State of North Carolina, 338 F.2d 697, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3885 (4th Cir. 1964).

338 F.2d 697 (Leo Duboise v. State of North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Application of Buccheri
431 P.2d 91 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1967)
Warner Company v. National Labor Relations Board
365 F.2d 435 (Third Circuit, 1966)
Williams v. United States Court
246 F. Supp. 968 (E.D. North Carolina, 1965)