Leo Duboise v. State of North Carolina
This text of 338 F.2d 697 (Leo Duboise v. State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leo DuBoise, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, filed his petition in the court below for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that at the time of his trial he “requested that he be put on the stand in his own behalf” and that his counsel “did not want your petitioner to take the stand in his own behalf.”
The District Court, accepting the factual allegations of the petition as true, concluded that they presented no constitutional question and dismissed the petition without requiring the state to answer and without a hearing.
Following dismissal of his petition, DuBoise addressed to one of the individual judges of this court what purports to be a “Petition for Writ of Certiorari,” appearing in the record on appeal, in which he attempts to allege facts in addition to those alleged in his habeas corpus petition.
We affirm the action of the District Court, without prejudice, however, to petitioner’s right to amend his original petition or file a new petition as he may be advised.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
338 F.2d 697, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-duboise-v-state-of-north-carolina-ca4-1964.