Leo Cornelius Kinney v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Leo Cornelius Kinney v. United States

207 F.2d 780

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 12, 1953

Docket4732_1

StatusPublished

This text of 207 F.2d 780 (Leo Cornelius Kinney v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leo Cornelius Kinney v. United States, 207 F.2d 780 (10th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

207 F.2d 780

Leo Cornelius KINNEY,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 4732.

United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1953.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed, on motion of appellee, for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Jim Barnett and Carroll Samara, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.

Robert E. Shelton, U.S. Atty., and B. Andrew Potter, Asst. U.S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

207 F.2d 780

Leo Cornelius KINNEY,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 4732.

United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1953.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed, on motion of appellee, for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Jim Barnett and Carroll Samara, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.

Robert E. Shelton, U.S. Atty., and B. Andrew Potter, Asst. U.S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 F.2d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-cornelius-kinney-v-united-states-ca10-1953.