Leo Bros. v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Leo Bros. v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance

228 P. 259, 39 Idaho 554, 1924 Ida. LEXIS 50

DecidedAugust 2, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 228 P. 259 (Leo Bros. v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leo Bros. v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance, 228 P. 259, 39 Idaho 554, 1924 Ida. LEXIS 50 (Idaho 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

McCARTHY, C. J.

This case and Leo Brothers Co. v. New Zealand Insurance Co., ante, p. 548, 228 Pac. 257, were by stipulation submitted together to the court below, and this court, the facts and questions of law being substantially similar. On the authority of the decision in the last-named case, the judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Budge, William A. Lee, JJ., and Johnson, District Judge, concur. Wm. E. Lee, J., being disqualified, took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCARTHY, C. J.

This case and Leo Brothers Co. v. New Zealand Insurance Co., ante, p. 548, 228 Pac. 257, were by stipulation submitted together to the court below, and this court, the facts and questions of law being substantially similar. On the authority of the decision in the last-named case, the judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Budge, William A. Lee, JJ., and Johnson, District Judge, concur. Wm. E. Lee, J., being disqualified, took no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 P. 259, 39 Idaho 554, 1924 Ida. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-bros-v-springfield-fire-marine-insurance-idaho-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack