Leo Bray Hudlin, Jr. v. State
This text of Leo Bray Hudlin, Jr. v. State (Leo Bray Hudlin, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBERS
13-10-00081-CR
13-10-00082-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
LEO BRAY HUDLIN, JR., Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 329th District Court
of Wharton County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Leo Bray Hudlin, Jr., received two convictions for tampering with or fabricating physical evidence. On February 22, 2010, appellant filed notices of appeal. On December 30, 2010, this Court abated the appeals because of counsel=s failure to file a brief and ordered the trial court to determine whether appellant desired to prosecute the appeals.
At the trial court hearing, appellant signed a document stating that he waives his right of appeal and abandons his appeal in both cause numbers. The document is signed by appellant’s counsel and approved by the trial court judge.
Based upon the evidence at the hearing that appellant does not want to continue his appeals, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in these cases. See Tex. R. App. P. 2. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
24th day of March, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leo Bray Hudlin, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-bray-hudlin-jr-v-state-texapp-2011.