Lentz v. . Hinson

59 S.E. 144, 146 N.C. 31, 1907 N.C. LEXIS 6
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 13, 1907·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Be.owN, J.

The record shows that the defendant secured judgment against plaintiff on a counterclaim before the justice of the peace, on 29 April, 1904, and at the time the plaintiff took an appeal to Superior Court and paid the justice’s fees. The justice made out the transcript of appeal and handed it to the Clerk of said Court the same day. The Clerk’s fee for docketing was not paid or tendered, and he was not requested to docket the appeal, and it was not docketed or filed regularly until 12 September, 1904. A regular term of the Court was held 18 July, 1904, and, although it was for the trial of criminal cases, the appeal should have been docketed by that term.

The point is expressly decided and tire reasons given in Blair v. Coakly, 136 N. C., 407.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lentz v. . Hinson, 59 S.E. 144, 146 N.C. 31, 1907 N.C. LEXIS 6 (N.C. 1907).

59 S.E. 144 (Lentz v. . Hinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Opinion No. (1980)
Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1980
Starr Electric Co. v. Lipe Motor Lines, Inc.
47 S.E.2d 848 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Love v. . Huffines
66 S.E. 304 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
MacKenzie v. Davidson County Development Co.
65 S.E. 1003 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
McClintock v. . Insurance Co.
62 S.E. 775 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)