Lentz v. . Hinson
This text of 59 S.E. 144 (Lentz v. . Hinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record shows that the defendant secured judgment against plaintiff on a counterclaim before the justice of the peace, on 29 April, 1904, and at the time the plaintiff took an appeal to Superior Court and paid the justice’s fees. The justice made out the transcript of appeal and handed it to the Clerk of said Court the same day. The Clerk’s fee for docketing was not paid or tendered, and he was not requested to docket the appeal, and it was not docketed or filed regularly until 12 September, 1904. A regular term of the Court was held 18 July, 1904, and, although it was for the trial of criminal cases, the appeal should have been docketed by that term.
The point is expressly decided and tire reasons given in Blair v. Coakly, 136 N. C., 407.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 S.E. 144, 146 N.C. 31, 1907 N.C. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lentz-v-hinson-nc-1907.