Lentschner v. Lentschner

80 N.Y.S. 146

This text of 80 N.Y.S. 146 (Lentschner v. Lentschner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lentschner v. Lentschner, 80 N.Y.S. 146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

McLAUGHLIN, J.

This action was brought to dissolve a marriage contract on the ground of fraud. The defendant made default in pleading, and did not appear at the trial or on the argument of the appeal. The trial court, after hearing the proof offered by the plaintiff, rendered judgment dismissing her complaint upon the merits, from which she has appealed.

The learned trial justice sitting at special term made no decision, and there is, therefore, mo basis for the judgment. Where the whole issue is one of fact, and is tried by the court without a jury, a decision must be made before a judgment can be rendered. Section 1228, Code Civ. Proc. This is absolutely necessary; otherwise there are no facts to sustain the legal conclusion drawn. Deeley v. Heintz, 169 N. Y. 135, 62 N. E. 158. We are therefore unable to determine whether or not the court erred in rendering'the judgment which he did, inasmuch as we are precluded from examining the case on the merits; and for that treason we think the judgment appealed from should be vacated, and the matter remitted to the special term to the end that a decision may be made. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deeley v. . Heintz
62 N.E. 158 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.Y.S. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lentschner-v-lentschner-nyappdiv-1903.