Lentsch v. International Railway Co.
This text of 169 A.D. 911 (Lentsch v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the assumption of the court in charging the jury that the car was in sight but not within the radius of safety, is not warranted by the testimony actually given by the plaintiff, and that the exception to the charge presents reversible error. All concurred, except Robson, J., who dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 A.D. 911, 153 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lentsch-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1915.