Lentino v. Lentino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lentino v. Lentino

185 A.D.2d 849, 587 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 10, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 185 A.D.2d 849 (Lentino v. Lentino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lentino v. Lentino, 185 A.D.2d 849, 587 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.), dated December 16, 1991, which, after a hearing, found that the respondent was in willful violation of an order of protection dated April 25, 1991, and sentenced him to a term of 30 days in the Nassau County Correctional Facility.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant contends that the evidence presented at the hearing was insufficient to support the Family Court’s finding that he willfully violated the order of protection. This contention is without merit. The evidence adduced at the hearing established, by competent proof, that the appellant willfully violated the order of protection (see, Family Ct Act § 846-a) when he went to the petitioner’s residence without her permission, demanded money from her, and engaged in disruptive behavior (see, Matter of Leonetti v Riehl, 154 AD2d 675, 676).

We have considered the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a family offense proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.), dated December 16, 1991, which, after a hearing, found that the respondent was in willful violation of an order of protection dated April 25, 1991, and sentenced him to a term of 30 days in the Nassau County Correctional Facility.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant contends that the evidence presented at the hearing was insufficient to support the Family Court’s finding that he willfully violated the order of protection. This contention is without merit. The evidence adduced at the hearing established, by competent proof, that the appellant willfully violated the order of protection (see, Family Ct Act § 846-a) when he went to the petitioner’s residence without her permission, demanded money from her, and engaged in disruptive behavior (see, Matter of Leonetti v Riehl, 154 AD2d 675, 676).

We have considered the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 A.D.2d 849, 587 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lentino-v-lentino-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack