Lentine v. Green
This text of 119 Misc. 648 (Lentine v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From the agreed statement of facts it does not clearly appear that the fact is conceded that the wife of a prior grantor in the chain of title did not join in the conveyance and that she is still alive and her inchoate right of dower outstanding. But the brief of defendant recognizes that the fact is that the wife in question did not join in the conveyance and that she is still alive.
[649]*649But it is claimed her dower right was extinguished under an order of this court. The wife was insane and a committee was appointed for her. Thereafter a proceeding was begun to dispose of her inchoate right of dower. In that proceeding “ attorneys for the respective interests therein settled their differences,” and upon consent an order was entered fixing the value of the dower interest.
This court had no power to make such an order upon consent and it is a nullity. Hence there is an outstanding dower right, and defendant cannot convey a good, clear title.
Judgment for the plaintiffs for the amount stipulated.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 Misc. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lentine-v-green-nysupct-1922.