Lent v. Title Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lent v. Title Insurance

117 N.Y.S. 901

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 117 N.Y.S. 901 (Lent v. Title Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lent v. Title Insurance, 117 N.Y.S. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The defendant appeals from an order permitting the plaintiff to amend his complaint. The order was based upon an affidavit made by the plaintiff’s attorney, and failed to show that the affiant had any knowledge of the additional facts sought to be incorporated in the complaint by the proposed amendment. The affidavit upon which the motion was made was insufficient as a basis for granting the relief sought. Tompkins v. Continental National Bank. 71 App. Div. 330, 75 N. Y. Supp. 1099; Rhodes v. Lewin, 83 App. Div. 369, 54 N. Y. Supp. 106.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

The defendant appeals from an order permitting the plaintiff to amend his complaint. The order was based upon an affidavit made by the plaintiff’s attorney, and failed to show that the affiant had any knowledge of the additional facts sought to be incorporated in the complaint by the proposed amendment. The affidavit upon which the motion was made was insufficient as a basis for granting the relief sought. Tompkins v. Continental National Bank. 71 App. Div. 330, 75 N. Y. Supp. 1099; Rhodes v. Lewin, 83 App. Div. 369, 54 N. Y. Supp. 106.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 N.Y.S. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lent-v-title-insurance-nyappterm-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack