Lenox v. Wilson
This text of 15 F. Cas. 322 (Lenox v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action by the holder against the indorser of a- foreign bill of exchange, indorsed by the defendant' [William Wilson], in Alexandria (where the damages fixed by law áre ten per cent.), to the plaintiff [Lenox & Maitland), who resided in New. York, where the damages were fixed by law at twenty per cent. The jury gave their verdict for the New York damages.
A motion by the defendant for a new trial, on the ground of excessive damages, was overruled by THE COURT, on the plaintiffs’ releasing the difference, which was about 444 dollars.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 F. Cas. 322, 1 Cranch 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenox-v-wilson-circtddc-1804.