Lenora v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Lenora v. State

1931 OK CR 320, 1 P.2d 832, 51 Okla. Crim. 291, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 329

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided July 11, 1931·No. No. A-8056.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Pittsburg county on a charge of having the possession of intoxicating liquor and was sen *292 tenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve 90 days in the county jail. He filed an application for the record, supported by a sufficient affidavit showing his inability to pay for same. His application was denied. This was error requiring a reversal. Jeffries v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 573, 132 Pac. 823; Hutchins v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 717, 167 Pac. 338; Brogdon v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 269, 260 Pac. 784.

The case is reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Pittsburg county on a charge of having the possession of intoxicating liquor and was sen *292 tenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve 90 days in the county jail. He filed an application for the record, supported by a sufficient affidavit showing his inability to pay for same. His application was denied. This was error requiring a reversal. Jeffries v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 573, 132 Pac. 823; Hutchins v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 717, 167 Pac. 338; Brogdon v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 269, 260 Pac. 784.

The case is reversed and remanded.

Lenora v. State, 1931 OK CR 320, 1 P.2d 832, 51 Okla. Crim. 291, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 329 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

1931 OK CR 320 (Lenora v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related