Lenora Page v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

LENORA PAGE PLAINTIFF

V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:26-CV-3-KHJ-MTP

FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN

ORDER

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker’s [13] Report and Recommendation. The [13] Report recommends dismissing this action without prejudice because pro se Plaintiff Lenora Page (“Page”) failed to prosecute the case or comply with the Court’s orders. R. & R. [13] at 3. The Court adopts the [13] Report. Written objections to the [13] Report were due by June 1, 2026. at 3. The [13] Report notified the parties that failure to file written objections by that date would bar further appeal in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. No party objected to the [13] Report, and the time to do so has passed. The Court must review de novo a magistrate judge’s report only when a party objects to the report within 14 days after being served with a copy. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). When no party timely objects to the report, the Court applies “the ‘clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law’ standard of review.” , 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam). Finding the [13] Report neither clearly erroneous, contrary to law, nor an abuse of discretion, the Court adopts it and dismisses this case without prejudice. In doing so, the Court has considered all arguments raised. Those arguments not

addressed would not have altered the Court’s decision. The Court will enter a separate final judgment consistent with this Order. SO ORDERED, this 8th day of June, 2026. s/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE