Lenora Daugherty v. Donal Campbell, Individually and as Employee of Tennessee Dept. Of Corrections, Alton R. Hesson Robert W. Starbuck Funderburk Rita A. Starbuck Kevin W. Daniels Bobby L. Chessor, Individually and as Employees of the Tennessee Department of Corrections
This text of 887 F.2d 265 (Lenora Daugherty v. Donal Campbell, Individually and as Employee of Tennessee Dept. Of Corrections, Alton R. Hesson Robert W. Starbuck Funderburk Rita A. Starbuck Kevin W. Daniels Bobby L. Chessor, Individually and as Employees of the Tennessee Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Lenora DAUGHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Donal CAMPBELL, Individually and as Employee of Tennessee
Dept. of Corrections, Defendant-Appellant,
Alton R. Hesson; Robert W. Starbuck; Funderburk; Rita A.
Starbuck; Kevin W. Daniels; Bobby L. Chessor,
Individually and as Employees of the
Tennessee Department of
Corrections, Defendants.
No. 89-6008.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 16, 1989.
Rehearing Granted June 13, 1990.
Before KEITH, MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
A review of the documents before the court indicates that appellant appealed from the district court's partial dismissal entered June 15, 1989. That order reserved judgment on the automobile search issue pending a report and recommendation by the magistrate.
This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Absent a Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification, an order disposing of fewer than all the claims or parties involved in the action is not appealable. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 742-45 (1976); Solomon v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 782 F.2d 58, 59-60 (6th Cir.1986). No Rule 54(b) certification was made in the instant case. The final decision of the district court has not been entered during the pendency of this appeal; therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction. See Gillis v. United States Dep't of HHS, 759 F.2d 565, 568-69 (6th Cir.1985).
It is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
887 F.2d 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenora-daugherty-v-donal-campbell-individually-and-as-employee-of-ca6-1990.