Lenoir v. Valley River Mining Co.
This text of 10 S.E. 525 (Lenoir v. Valley River Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is the duty of parties, and important to them, especially in cases of moment, to see that their appeals are prosecuted in this Court industriously, and thoroughly argued. Such arguments are not only valuable helps to the Court, but, in some cases, they are essential to a proper understanding and decision of them. Parties should earnestly endeavor to present their cases before the Court in the most intelligible manner practicable, especially as this is the Court of last resort, settling the law in its-application to cases indefinitely. It is of the highest importance that it shall be settled correctly.
We have examined the record in this case with considerable scrutiny. It is voluminous and confused. The assignments of error in several important respects are indefinite and scarcely intelligible, as we see them. We are unable, so far, to interpret them satisfactorily. The elaborate brief of the appellant has reference to only a part of the errors assigned, and the counsel present said little more than read it. The case was not argued at all for the appel-lees. It seems to be of considerable importance and merits *491 to be thoroughly argued. Indeed, we think it due to the parties to direct that it be reargued for the appellants, and argued also for the appellees, at the next term. To that end the case must be continued. The Clerk will give the parties notice of this order.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 S.E. 525, 104 N.C. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenoir-v-valley-river-mining-co-nc-1889.