Lenoir v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lenoir v. State

391 S.W.3d 513, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 160, 2013 WL 433674

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 2013·No. No. WD 74636·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Melvin Lenoir appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Mr. Lenoir argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion because his guilty plea was involuntary in that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Melvin Lenoir appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Mr. Lenoir argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion because his guilty plea was involuntary in that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Lenoir v. State, 391 S.W.3d 513, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 160, 2013 WL 433674 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 513 (Lenoir v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.