Leno v. State
This text of 952 S.W.2d 860 (Leno v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[861]*861 OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at confinement for twenty-five years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Leño v. State, 934 S.W.2d 421 (Tex.App.—Waco 1996). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address the Court of Appeals’ decision upholding the order transferring appellant to district court to be tried as an adult despite its failure to specifically include appellant’s age at the time of the offense or his date of birth.
After further consideration of the petition for discretionary review and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that appellant’s petition was improvidently granted. Therefore, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
952 S.W.2d 860, 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 75, 1997 WL 624668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leno-v-state-texcrimapp-1997.