Leno v. State

952 S.W.2d 860, 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 75, 1997 WL 624668
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 8, 1997·No. No. 047-97·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

[861] OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at confinement for twenty-five years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Leño v. State, 934 S.W.2d 421 (Tex.App.—Waco 1996). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address the Court of Appeals’ decision upholding the order transferring appellant to district court to be tried as an adult despite its failure to specifically include appellant’s age at the time of the offense or his date of birth.

After further consideration of the petition for discretionary review and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that appellant’s petition was improvidently granted. Therefore, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leno v. State, 952 S.W.2d 860, 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 75, 1997 WL 624668 (Tex. 1997).

952 S.W.2d 860 (Leno v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Theodore Michael Berry v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008
Joseph Lino Barela v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004
Tommy Pando v. State
133 S.W.3d 830 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Meek, Robert Allen v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
Rutzen, Russ v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
Hill v. State
78 S.W.3d 374 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Light v. State
15 S.W.3d 104 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)