Lenny v. Loehmann

78 A.D.2d 813, 433 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13484
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 78 A.D.2d 813 (Lenny v. Loehmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lenny v. Loehmann, 78 A.D.2d 813, 433 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinions

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered March 11, 1980, denying [814]*814defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 5), is reversed, on the law, and the motion to dismiss the complaint is granted, and the complaint is dismissed, without costs. The issue in this case is whether the two- and one-half year Statute of Limitations for medical malpractice cases (CPLR 214-a) or the three-year limitation for negligence actions (CPLR 214) is applicable. In our view the two- and one-half year medical malpractice statute is the applicable statute. It is here claimed that plaintiff, a patient of defendant, a physician, was injured when she fell out of bed in the hospital because the bed’s side rails were not raised, and that defendant’s physician was negligent in failing to instruct that the side rails be raised, or in failing to check the condition of the side rails after they had been put up, or to supervise plaintiff’s movements to and from the bed. The alleged breach by defendant is a claim of a breach of his duty as a physician arising out of the physician-patient relationship, a breach of his duty as a physician to take care of his patient. In our view, this is a claim for medical malpractice and not a claim for ordinary negligence of a kind that would not be included within medical malpractice. It is thus barred by the Statute of Limitations applicable to medical malpractice actions. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Ross and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
319 S.W.3d 658 (Texas Supreme Court, 2010)
D'Elia v. Menorah Home & Hospital for the Aged and Infirm
51 A.D.3d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Kolanowski v. Illinois Valley Community Hospital
544 N.E.2d 821 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1989)
Ross v. Community General Hospital
150 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Fox v. White Plains Medical Center
125 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Stanley v. Lebetkin
123 A.D.2d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
White v. Sheehan Memorial Hospital
119 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A.D.2d 813, 433 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenny-v-loehmann-nyappdiv-1980.