Lennon v. MacIntosh
19 Abb. N. Cas. 175
Opinion
The costs originally imposed as a condition of granting the favor then applied for, were allowed by way of penalty for the default suffered and are not to be deducted from the taxable costs to which the successful party ultimately becomes entitled (Cohn v. Husson, 13 Daly, 334, at p. 338; aff’g 3 How. Pr. N. S. 130). As the successful party is entitled'to afee for each trial, the $30 should not have been disallowed.
Retaxation ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lennon v. MacIntosh, 19 Abb. N. Cas. 175 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).
19 Abb. N. Cas. 175 (Lennon v. MacIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moniz v. National Constructors, Inc.
201 Misc. 393 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
Engberman v. North German Lloyd Steamship Co.
84 N.Y.S. 199 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co.
68 A.D. 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Kummer v. Christopher & Tenth St. Railroad
33 N.Y.S. 581 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Byrne v. Brooklyn City & Newtown R. Co.
6 Misc. 6 (New York City Court, 1893)