Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lennon v. Hahne

Lennon v. Hahne

202 So. 3d 956, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16223
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 2016·No. No. 4D16-1815·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant is not precluded from filing any future motions to modify or dissolve the injunction for consideration by the trial court. See Betterman v. Kukelhan, 977 So.2d 702, 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lennon v. Hahne, 202 So. 3d 956, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16223 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

202 So. 3d 956 (Lennon v. Hahne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Betterman v. Kukelhan
977 So. 2d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)