Lennon v. Cuomo

92 A.D.3d 411, 937 N.Y.2d 588

This text of 92 A.D.3d 411 (Lennon v. Cuomo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lennon v. Cuomo, 92 A.D.3d 411, 937 N.Y.2d 588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

[412]*412Respondent’s issuance of subpoenas in connection with an investigation into complaints from consumers and publishers alleging fraudulent and deceptive practices in petitioner magazine subscription agents’ issuance of notices for the renewal of magazine subscriptions was within his broad authority (see Executive Law § 63 [12]; General Business Law § 349; Matter of American Dental Coop, v Attorney-General of State of N.Y., 127 AD2d 274, 280 [1987]). The information sought “bears a reasonable relationship to the subject matter under investigation and the public interest to be served” (American Dental Coop., 127 AD2d at 280). Concur — Gonzalez, PJ., Saxe, Moskowitz, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Dental Cooperative, Inc. v. Attorney-General
127 A.D.2d 274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.3d 411, 937 N.Y.2d 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lennon-v-cuomo-nyappdiv-2012.