Lenney v. Commissioner

1958 T.C. Memo. 170, 17 T.C.M. 850, 1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 53
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedSeptember 18, 1958
DocketDocket Nos. 64899, 64919, 66663.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1958 T.C. Memo. 170 (Lenney v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lenney v. Commissioner, 1958 T.C. Memo. 170, 17 T.C.M. 850, 1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 53 (tax 1958).

Opinion

Myrtle C. Lenney, Transferee, Incompetent, D. J. La Polla, Guardian v. Commissioner. George F. Wise, Transferee v. Commissioner. Myrtle C. Lenney, Transferee, Incompetent, D. J. La Polla, Guardian v. Commissioner.
Lenney v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 64899, 64919, 66663.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1958-170; 1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 53; 17 T.C.M. (CCH) 850; T.C.M. (RIA) 58170;
September 18, 1958

*53 Held, where transfers were made to petitioners without consideration by a delinquent taxpayer, as a part of a plan to hinder and defeat the collection of his delinquent tax, petitioners are liable as transferees to the extent of the transfers to each.

George D. Lewis, Esq., and D. J. La Polla, Esq., 155 Pine N.E., Warren, Ohio., for the petitioners. William O. Allen, Esq., for the respondent.

MULRONEY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

MULRONEY, Judge: Respondent determined transferee liabilities for petitioners, and by affirmative pleadings increased his claim, as follows:

DocketAs OriginallyAs Claimed by
No.DeterminedRespondent
64899$37,386.90$39,619.88
6491914,706.9616,206.96
666631,800.792,683.05

The questions presented are whether the petitioners are liable as the transferees of assets of Clarence B. Lenney and the Phoenix Improvement Company.

Findings of Fact

Some of the facts were stipulated and they are found accordingly.

There is due and owing from Clarence B. Lenney income taxes, fraud penalties, additions to tax and assessed interest as follows:

YearAmount
1942$14,710.65
19432,531.00
19442,683.00
19457,827.00
1952 Original8,468.54
1952 Additional2,232.98
$38,453.17

*54 The deficiencies for the years 1942 through 1945, respectively, arose as the result of the case of Clarence B. Lenney, Docket No. 33109, which was settled by stipulation of the parties, the Tax Court's order and decision having been entered on February 25, 1953.

The original deficiency for the year 1952 arose from the failure of Clarence B. Lenney to pay the income tax shown to be due on the income tax return filed by him for the year 1952. The additional deficiency for the year 1952 arose as the result of an additional assessment made by respondent subsequent to the filing of the petition and answer herein.

Clarence B. Lenney died on January 31, 1956. His will was filed for probate in the Probate Court of Trumbull County, Ohio, on February 28, 1956, and the estate file shows that he had assets at the time of death of $9,125.92, and the claims filed against the estate were in the total sum of $46,460.30.

Petitioner, Myrtle C. Lenney, the widow of Clarence B. Lenney, is an incompetent, having been declared incompetent by the Probate Court of Trumbull County, Ohio, October 8, 1956. She has, since that date, been confined in the Massillon State Hospital for the insane and she*55 was not qualified to testify. She appears here through her duly appointed guardian, D. J. La Polla.

Some time early in 1952 a company in which Lenney had an interest was liquidated and Clarence B. Lenney received a large amount of cash. On February 21, 1952 he deposited $45,000 in a new bank account in his name in The Second National Bank of Warren, Warren, Ohio. Almost immediately thereafter Lenney embarked upon a program of concealing all of his assets with the intent of defeating the collection of his tax liabilities. This plan involved making transfers to his wife, Myrtle C. Lenney, and to a partnership called the Associated Engineering Company, hereinafter sometimes called the partnership, in which his wife and his nephew, George F. Wise, petitioner in Docket No. 64919, were equal partners.

On February 25, 1952, Clarence B. Lenney drew a check on the account of C. B. Lenney payable to Myrtle C. Lenney in the amount of $5,000. The check was cashed by Myrtle C. Lenney.

On March 21, 1952, Clarence B. Lenney purchased a cashier's check at The Second National Bank of Warren, which check was charged to the account of C. B. Lenney. The check was payable to "H. W. Davis" in the*56 amount of $32,000. The check was endorsed by "H. W. Davis" and was deposited with The Home Savings and Loan Company, Youngstown, Ohio.

Clarence B. Lenney was also known as H. W. Davis. From March 24, 1952 until the date of his death he maintained a Running Stock Account in the name of "H. W. or Chrystina W. Davis" at The Home Savings and Loan Company, Youngstown, Ohio.

On April 10, 1952 Clarence B. Lenney purchased a cashier's check at The Home Savings and Loan Company, which check was charged to the account of H. W. Davis. The check was payable to T. R. Wigglesworth Machinery Co.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nau v. Commissioner
27 T.C. 999 (U.S. Tax Court, 1957)
May v. Commissioner
35 B.T.A. 84 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1958 T.C. Memo. 170, 17 T.C.M. 850, 1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenney-v-commissioner-tax-1958.