Lenling v. Delano

199 N.E.2d 535, 347 Mass. 778
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 28, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 199 N.E.2d 535 (Lenling v. Delano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lenling v. Delano, 199 N.E.2d 535, 347 Mass. 778 (Mass. 1964).

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. In this action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff in an intersection collision of two automobiles in New Bedford, there was ne, error in denying the defendant’s motions for a directed verdict and a new trial. That the plaintiff stopped his ear for only two or three seconds at a stop sign plainly did not require a ruling that an ordinance requiring a “complete stop” had been violated. The testimony as to what the plaintiff and the defendant saw and did and the way the two automobiles operated by them came into the intersection and collided made the issues of negligence and contributory negligence questions for the jury. There was evidence for the jury on the issue of damages and the judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maccarone v. Phillips
1986 Mass. App. Div. 17 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1986)
Canane v. Dandini
242 N.E.2d 854 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1968)
Netto v. Brown
43 Mass. App. Dec. 27 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.E.2d 535, 347 Mass. 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenling-v-delano-mass-1964.