Lenkiewicz v. Donovan
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DENISE L. LENKIEWICZ,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 13-0261 (RCL)
FILED
JUL 3 1 2015
Clerk, US. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Cnlumhi:
V.
JULIAN CASTRO, Secretary, US. Department of Housing and Urban Development
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Defendant.
9MB.
Upon consideration of the plaintiff” 5 Motion [56] for Summary Judgment, the defendant’s Opposition [67], and the plaintiff” 5 Reply [68], as well as the defendant’s Motion [57] for Summary Judgment, the plaintiff’s Opposition [64] and the defendant’s Reply [72], it is hereby
ORDERED that the plaintiff’ s Motion [56] is DENIED and defendant’s Motion [57] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The defendant’s motion is GRANTED with respect to the portions of Lenkiewicz’s claim involving her 2009 relocation request, her 2009 request to telework, her 2009 request for a printer, her 2009 request for a parking space, and her termination. The defendant’s motion is DENIED with respect to Lenkiewicz’s December 22, 2010 request to telework. Genuine issues of material fact remain in dispute with regards to the
portion ofthe plaintiff” 5 claim concerning her December 2010 request to telework.
It is SO ORDERED this 3 lst day ofJuly 2015.
( EWIE . LAMBERTH
United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lenkiewicz v. Donovan (Lenkiewicz v. Donovan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.