Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK, Case No. 20-cv-08094-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 Vv. REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF AN AMENDED JUDGMENT 10 MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., [Re: ECF 68, 71] 11 Defendant. 12

13 Judgment was entered for Defendant on November 10, 2021. See ECF 33. On October

v 14 12, 2022, Defendant filed a Proposed Amended Judgment that incorporates a post-judgment award

15 || of attorneys’ fees and costs. See ECF 68. The Court directed Defendant to file additional briefing Q 16 || addressing the Court’s authority to enter an amended judgment, and directed Plaintiff to file any

= 17 || opposition within fourteen days after Defendant filed its brief. See ECF 70. 2 18 Defendant filed its brief on October 21, 2022, citing cases in which courts have issued 19 || amended judgments to incorporate post-judgment awards of attorneys’ fees. See ECF 71. The 20 || Court is satisfied that it has authority to enter the requested amended judgment. See Baskin- 21 Robbins Franchising LLC v. Chun, No. 5:18-CV-05476-BLF, 2019 WL 5268883, at *4 (N.D. Cal. 22 || Oct. 17, 2019). Plaintiff has not filed opposition and his deadline to do so expired on November 23 || 4, 2022. 24 Defendant’s request for entry of an amended judgment is GRANTED. The amended 25 || judgment will be entered immediately after this order is filed. 26 27 Dated: November 8, 2022 ey) BETH LABSON FREEMAN 28 United States District Judge