Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Opinion
1 2 6 7 KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK, Case No. 20-cv-08094-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 Vv. REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF AN AMENDED JUDGMENT [Re: ECF 68, 71] 11 Defendant. 12
13 Judgment was entered for Defendant on November 10, 2021. See ECF 33. On October
v 14 12, 2022, Defendant filed a Proposed Amended Judgment that incorporates a post-judgment award
15 of attorneys’ fees and costs. See ECF 68. The Court directed Defendant to file additional briefing Q 16 || addressing the Court’s authority to enter an amended judgment, and directed Plaintiff to file any
= 17 || opposition within fourteen days after Defendant filed its brief. See ECF 70. 2 18 Defendant filed its brief on October 21, 2022, citing cases in which courts have issued 19 amended judgments to incorporate post-judgment awards of attorneys’ fees. See ECF 71. The 20 Court is satisfied that it has authority to enter the requested amended judgment. See Baskin- 21 Robbins Franchising LLC v. Chun, No. 5:18-CV-05476-BLF, 2019 WL 5268883, at *4 (N.D. Cal. 22 Oct. 17, 2019). Plaintiff has not filed opposition and his deadline to do so expired on November 23 4, 2022. 24 Defendant’s request for entry of an amended judgment is GRANTED. The amended 25 judgment will be entered immediately after this order is filed. 26 27 Dated: November 8, 2022 ey) BETH LABSON FREEMAN 28 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.