Lenick v. Lenick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lenick v. Lenick

11 A.D.2d 924, 208 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8276

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 924 (Lenick v. Lenick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lenick v. Lenick, 11 A.D.2d 924, 208 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for a stay and for leave to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for respondent and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before November 3, 1960, with notice of argument for November 15, 1960, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for a stay and for leave to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for respondent and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before November 3, 1960, with notice of argument for November 15, 1960, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 924, 208 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenick-v-lenick-nyappdiv-1960.