Lenhart v. Pettis

17 A. 622, 126 Pa. 420, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 891
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 13, 1889
DocketNo. 465
StatusPublished

This text of 17 A. 622 (Lenhart v. Pettis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lenhart v. Pettis, 17 A. 622, 126 Pa. 420, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 891 (Pa. 1889).

Opinion

Pur Curiam :

This case is ruled by Read’s Appeal, just decided. The facts are substantially the same. In the present case, however, there was nothing in the court below in support of the rule to strike off the satisfaction and open the judgment, save the unsupported deposition of the appellant. And in that deposition he states that the judgment was satisfied by the bank at his request. There was no room, therefore, for the allegation that the satisfaction was fraudulently entered, and was a device to cover up usury. The case was entirely void of merit.

The decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A. 622, 126 Pa. 420, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenhart-v-pettis-pa-1889.