Lengele v. Moore

Oregon Supreme Court

Lengele v. Moore

152 P. 267, 77 Or. 647, 1915 Ore. LEXIS 165

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 22, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 P. 267 (Lengele v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lengele v. Moore, 152 P. 267, 77 Or. 647, 1915 Ore. LEXIS 165 (Or. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Eakin

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. The motion must be sustained upon both grounds. Appellant’s time to file his transcript in this court expired on the sixteenth day of August, and it was not [648]*648filed until the 31st. The law requires that it shall he filed within 30 days from the time the appeal is perfected, which time was the seventeenth day of July. The case of the East Side Lumber Co. v. Feldman et al., ante, p. 644 (152 Pac. 266), holds that a consent decree cannot be appealed from, citing numerous authorities which it is not necessary to repeat here.

Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Eakin

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. The motion must be sustained upon both grounds. Appellant’s time to file his transcript in this court expired on the sixteenth day of August, and it was not [648]*648filed until the 31st. The law requires that it shall he filed within 30 days from the time the appeal is perfected, which time was the seventeenth day of July. The case of the East Side Lumber Co. v. Feldman et al., ante, p. 644 (152 Pac. 266), holds that a consent decree cannot be appealed from, citing numerous authorities which it is not necessary to repeat here.

Appeal Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 P. 267, 77 Or. 647, 1915 Ore. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lengele-v-moore-or-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack