Lenfestey v. United States Balloon Corp.
This text of 699 So. 2d 850 (Lenfestey v. United States Balloon Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the order of the trial court dismissing this case for failure of the pro se appellant to attend a case management conference. The order of dismissal failed to contain an express finding of deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court’s authority. See Commonwealth Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass’n. v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990).
Moreover, the record before us only reveals that the pro se litigant did not appear at an 8:45 a.m. case management conference. She had appeared at prior hearings, and she filed motions and other papers in the ease. The sanction of dismissal should be commensurate with the offense. See Insua v. World Wide Air, Inc., 582 So.2d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). On this record, the court provided the pro se litigant with no notice that her failure to appear would result in dismissal, and appellant’s conduct did not appear to be contumacious of the court’s authority and warrant dismissal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 So. 2d 850, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11144, 1997 WL 600573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenfestey-v-united-states-balloon-corp-fladistctapp-1997.