Lendberg v. Brotherton Iron Mining Co.

56 N.W. 846, 97 Mich. 443, 1893 Mich. LEXIS 908
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 1893·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Long, J.

This case was in this Court before* and is reported in 75 Mich. 84. It has again been tri’ed* and verdict directed in favor of the defendant. The court directed the jury that the case in. all respects was as it appeared upon the former trial* and that* under the ruling made by this Court upon the former record* defendant was entitled to their verdict.

Whether or not the court was right in the reasons given for directing a verdict in favor of defendant is immaterial* inasmuch as we think* under plaintiff's own testimony, it is shown that the deceased came to his death from injuries received by reason of his own negligence. It appears without contradiction that he had been directed by the officers of the defendant company not to w;ork at the pump during the time the men at the windlass were raising or lowering the buckets. He knew* at the time* that the buckets were being so used.

As this must dispose of the case* the other questions will not be discussed.

Judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lendberg v. Brotherton Iron Mining Co., 56 N.W. 846, 97 Mich. 443, 1893 Mich. LEXIS 908 (Mich. 1893).

56 N.W. 846 (Lendberg v. Brotherton Iron Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coke v. Michigan Central Railroad
143 N.W. 1 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1913)
Miami Coal Co. v. Kane
90 N.E. 13 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1909)
Cadillac State Bank v. Cadillac Stave & Heading Co.
88 N.W. 67 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)