Lend-Mor Mortgage Bankers Corp. v. Nicholas

85 A.D.3d 876, 925 N.Y.S.2d 834
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lend-Mor Mortgage Bankers Corp. v. Nicholas. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 A.D.3d 680

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Ameriquest Mortgage Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cullen, J.), dated March 19, 2010, which denied that branch of its cross motion which was to compel the plaintiff to respond to certain discovery demands.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Ameriquest Mortgage Company (hereinafter Ameriquest), which was to compel the plaintiff to respond to certain discovery demands.

Ameriquest’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lend-Mor Mortgage Bankers Corp. v. Nicholas, 85 A.D.3d 876, 925 N.Y.S.2d 834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

85 A.D.3d 876 (Lend-Mor Mortgage Bankers Corp. v. Nicholas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.