Lenczycki v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
692 N.E.2d 127, 91 N.Y.2d 918, 669 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 265
This text of 692 N.E.2d 127 (Lenczycki v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lenczycki v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 692 N.E.2d 127, 91 N.Y.2d 918, 669 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 265 (N.Y. 1998).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motion for reargument [919]*919or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
692 N.E.2d 127, 91 N.Y.2d 918, 669 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenczycki-v-shearson-lehman-hutton-inc-ny-1998.