Lenard v. Goodwin

554 So. 2d 294, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 2640, 1989 WL 155403
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 13, 1989·No. No. 89-CA-421·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

GAUDIN, Judge.

From the record, it is apparent that judgment was rendered in open court on March 15, 1989. The minutes for that date read:

“This matter came for trial on this date with all parties at interest present. After due examination the Court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the amount of $641.21 plus costs of court reduced by $60.00 to correct the problem. Reeon-ventional Demand denied.”

On March 27, the defendant appealed; however, no written judgment has yet been signed in conformity with LSA-C.C.P. art. 1911. Until one is signed and lodged with this Court, the appeal is premature and subject to dismissal. See Overmier v. Traylor, 475 So.2d 1094 (La.1985); and Perkins v. Salas, 507 So.2d 827 (La.App. 5 Cir.1987).

Nonetheless, this case was placed on the docket and called for oral argument on November 8, 1989, but neither appellant nor his attorney was present.

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed as being premature. Appellant is to pay costs.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lenard v. Goodwin, 554 So. 2d 294, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 2640, 1989 WL 155403 (La. Ct. App. 1989).

554 So. 2d 294 (Lenard v. Goodwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Beaudoin
939 So. 2d 428 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)
State v. Ramee
922 So. 2d 1247 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)