Lena v. Ensley
297 A.2d 841, 62 N.J. 19, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 148
This text of 297 A.2d 841 (Lena v. Ensley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lena v. Ensley, 297 A.2d 841, 62 N.J. 19, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 148 (N.J. 1972).
Opinion
This matter comes to us as of right because of dissent in the Appellate Division. The judgment of the-Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for reasons expressed in the majority opinion.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Wbintraub, Justices Jacobs, Hall and Mountain, and Judges Coneord, Sullivan and Lewis — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
297 A.2d 841, 62 N.J. 19, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lena-v-ensley-nj-1972.