Lemuel L. Cole v. United States Marshal Service

Fourth Circuit

Lemuel L. Cole v. United States Marshal Service

53 F.3d 328, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16734, 1995 WL 272573

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 10, 1995

Docket94-2442

StatusPublished

This text of 53 F.3d 328 (Lemuel L. Cole v. United States Marshal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lemuel L. Cole v. United States Marshal Service, 53 F.3d 328, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16734, 1995 WL 272573 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

53 F.3d 328
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lemuel L. COLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2442.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 10, 1995.

Lemuel L. Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Jeri Kaylene Somers, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Complaint against the United States Marshal Service raising claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. Secs. 2671-2680 (West 1994), and breach of contract. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cole v. United States Marshal Service, No. CA-94-533-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

53 F.3d 328
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lemuel L. COLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2442.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 10, 1995.

Lemuel L. Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Jeri Kaylene Somers, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Complaint against the United States Marshal Service raising claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. Secs. 2671-2680 (West 1994), and breach of contract. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cole v. United States Marshal Service, No. CA-94-533-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 F.3d 328, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16734, 1995 WL 272573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lemuel-l-cole-v-united-states-marshal-service-ca4-1995.