Lempert v. Steinberg & Pokoik Management Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Lempert v. Steinberg & Pokoik Management Corp.

860 N.E.2d 987, 7 N.Y.3d 917

New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 21, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. Questions of fact exist concerning whether a slippery substance on the floor caused plaintiffs injuries and, if so, whether defendants’ negligence created the condition.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo and Pigott. Judges Rosenblatt, Read and Smith dissent and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum by the Appellate Division (32 AD3d 215 [2006]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. Questions of fact exist concerning whether a slippery substance on the floor caused plaintiffs injuries and, if so, whether defendants’ negligence created the condition.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo and Pigott. Judges Rosenblatt, Read and Smith dissent and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum by the Appellate Division (32 AD3d 215 [2006]).

Lempert v. Steinberg & Pokoik Management Corp., 860 N.E.2d 987, 7 N.Y.3d 917 (N.Y. 2006).

Pincite

860 N.E.2d 987 (Lempert v. Steinberg & Pokoik Management Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related