Lemont v. State

620 So. 2d 250, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6714, 1993 WL 216908
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 23, 1993
DocketNo. 92-0028
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 620 So. 2d 250 (Lemont v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lemont v. State, 620 So. 2d 250, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6714, 1993 WL 216908 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse the sentence on Count I and remand with directions that the trial court either strike the community control provisions of that sentence, or enter an order setting forth legally justifiable reasons for deviating from the guidelines. See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990); Stanley v. State, 580 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

ANSTEAD, DELL and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Palm Beach Auto Brokers, Inc. v. DeCarlo
620 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 So. 2d 250, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6714, 1993 WL 216908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lemont-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.