Lemont v. State
620 So. 2d 250, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6714, 1993 WL 216908
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1993·No. No. 92-0028·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse the sentence on Count I and remand with directions that the trial court either strike the community control provisions of that sentence, or enter an order setting forth legally justifiable reasons for deviating from the guidelines. See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990); Stanley v. State, 580 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lemont v. State, 620 So. 2d 250, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6714, 1993 WL 216908 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
620 So. 2d 250 (Lemont v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palm Beach Auto Brokers, Inc. v. DeCarlo
620 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)