Lemont v. New York, L. E. & W. R. Co.

28 F. 920, 18 W.N.C. 431, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2393
CourtUnited States Circuit Court
DecidedOctober 23, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 28 F. 920 (Lemont v. New York, L. E. & W. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lemont v. New York, L. E. & W. R. Co., 28 F. 920, 18 W.N.C. 431, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2393 (uscirct 1886).

Opinion

.Botlee, J.

It is quite plain, on the facts stated, that the defendant is not responsible for the plaintiff’s loss. The Pennsylvania statute of June 13, 1874, (T?urd. Dig. 44,) governs the case. The object of this legislation was to relieve railroad companies, and other carriers and bailees from the duty (supposed or actual) of defending suits against the property intrusted to their care. The plaintiff received notice of the attachment, and it was his duty to appear and defend, if lie supposed any good could be accomplished by doing so.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McKie
191 S.W. 576 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. 920, 18 W.N.C. 431, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lemont-v-new-york-l-e-w-r-co-uscirct-1886.