Lemont v. County of Dodge

40 N.W. 359, 39 Minn. 385, 1888 Minn. LEXIS 133
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 13, 1888·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Mitchell, J.

It is sought by this writ to review the proceeding? of the county commissioners of Dodge county in forming a new school-district. The action of the commissioners in the premises was purely legislative, and in no sense judicial, and therefore not reviewable by certiorari. In re Wilson, 32 Minn. 145, (19 N. W. Rep. 723.) Unless we are prepared to assume a general supervision over all municipal corporations, boards, commissions, and public officers in the state, this writ must be confined to its legitimate office, which is to review proceedings judicial in their nature, which affect the citizen in his rights of person or property.

Writ quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lemont v. County of Dodge, 40 N.W. 359, 39 Minn. 385, 1888 Minn. LEXIS 133 (Mich. 1888).

40 N.W. 359 (Lemont v. County of Dodge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Huntley School District No. 4 JT. v. Schweickhard
45 N.W.2d 657 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1951)
State Ex Rel. v. City Council of Benson
209 N.W. 3 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
State ex rel. School District No. 44 v. County Board
148 N.W. 53 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
State ex rel. Hardy v. Clough
67 N.W. 202 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1896)
Moede v. County of Stearns
45 N.W. 435 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1890)
Christlieb v. County of Hennepin
42 N.W. 930 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1889)