Lemons v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Lemons v. State

198 So. 162, 29 Ala. App. 484

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 29, 1940

Docket6 Div. 662.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 So. 162 (Lemons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lemons v. State, 198 So. 162, 29 Ala. App. 484 (Ala. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

SIMPSON, Judge.

The controlling questions presented by this appeal are in all respects similar to those in the case of Daniel Pinkerton v. State, ante, p. 472, 198 So. 157, and the opinion rendered therein, governs this appeal.

Upon the authority, therefore, of Daniel Pinkerton v. State, supra, the judgment of the court below, upon which the instant appeal is predicated, is reversed, set aside and held for naught, and judgment is here rendered discharging this appellant from custody, and it is so ordered.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SIMPSON, Judge.

The controlling questions presented by this appeal are in all respects similar to those in the case of Daniel Pinkerton v. State, ante, p. 472, 198 So. 157, and the opinion rendered therein, governs this appeal.

Upon the authority, therefore, of Daniel Pinkerton v. State, supra, the judgment of the court below, upon which the instant appeal is predicated, is reversed, set aside and held for naught, and judgment is here rendered discharging this appellant from custody, and it is so ordered.

Reversed and rendered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 So. 162, 29 Ala. App. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lemons-v-state-alactapp-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack