Lemon v. Thaxton

59 Ga. 706
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Bleoicley, Judge.

The complainant seeks to reach assets of a testator which are of an equitable nature, and which are not accessible to him by means of ordinary legal process. lie alleges that he has obtained judgment against the executor, and annexes to his bill a copy of the ft. fa., on which there is a return of nuila bona. But the ft-fa., though it describes the defendant as executor, is against himpersonally. It contains no direction to levy of the goods, etc., of the testator. The presumption is that it follows the judgment, and consequently that the judgment is against the executor personally, and not in a condition to reach the effects of the estate until amended. 57 Ga., 159. We do not feel warranted in reversing the judgment dismissing the complainant’s bill.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lemon v. Thaxton, 59 Ga. 706 (Ga. 1877).

59 Ga. 706 (Lemon v. Thaxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wallace v. Stovall
5 S.E.2d 635 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Stansell v. Lowry
187 S.E. 722 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Interstate Bond Co. v. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance
183 S.E. 783 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Mobley v. Brightwell
160 S.E. 404 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Bishop v. Pinson
125 S.E. 880 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Wright v. Scott
89 S.E. 426 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Beall v. Hutcheson
61 S.E. 1125 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Ramsey v. Cole
10 S.E. 598 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)
Jones v. McCleod
61 Ga. 602 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1878)