Lemon v. Mt. Pleasant Waterworks
This text of Lemon v. Mt. Pleasant Waterworks (Lemon v. Mt. Pleasant Waterworks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
David B. Lemon, Claimant, Respondent,
v.
Mt. Pleasant Waterworks, Employer, and State Accident Fund, Carrier, Petitioners.
Appellate Case No. 2020-000481
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Commission
Opinion No. 28027 Heard May 6, 2021 – Filed May 12, 2021
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Kirsten Leslie Barr, of Trask & Howell, LLC, of Mt. Pleasant, for Petitioners.
Carl H. Jacobson, of Uricchio Howe Krell, PA, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Lemon v. Mt. Pleasant Waterworks, 429 S.C. 59, 837 S.E.2d 738 (Ct. App. 2019). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.1
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
1 Petitioners moved to supplement the record two days prior to oral argument. With Respondent's consent, the motion to supplement the record is granted. However, these additional materials do not affect the disposition of this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lemon v. Mt. Pleasant Waterworks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lemon-v-mt-pleasant-waterworks-sc-2021.