Lemon v. John Doe (1)

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 14, 2023·No. 7:23-cv-04698·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES P. LEMON, Plaintiff, 23-CV-4698 (KMK) -v.- ORDER OF SERVICE JOHN DOE #1, et al., Defendants. KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this Action, alleging that members of the Village of Ossining Police Department used excessive force against him. The Court construes Plaintiff’s Complaint as asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. (See Compl. (Dkt. No. 1).) By order dated June 7, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees. (Dkt. No. 3.) I. Discussion A. Service on Defendant Anthony Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.1 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP).

1 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the Complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served the summons and the Complaint until the Court reviewed the Complaint and ordered that the summons be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date the summons is issued. To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendant Sgt. Anthony through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for this defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the

Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendant. If the Complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons is issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss this Action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. John Doe Defendants Under Valentin v. Dinkins, 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997), a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. In the Complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit the Corporation Counsel for the Village of Ossining to identify

the three John Doe defendants, identified as members of the Village of Ossining Police Department, who were allegedly involved in the incident giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims. (See Compl. 5–6.) It is therefore ordered that the Corporation Counsel for the Village of Ossining, which is the attorney for and agent of the Village of Ossining Police Department, must ascertain the identity and badge number of each John Doe whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the address where each defendant may be served. The Corporation Counsel for the Village of Ossining must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint naming the John Doe defendants. An amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original Complaint. An amended complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this order. Once Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, the Court will screen the amended

complaint and, if necessary, issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for the newly named John Doe defendants and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. C. New York Legal Assistance Group’s Clinic Plaintiff may consider contacting the New York Legal Assistance Group’s (“NYLAG”) Clinic for Pro Se Litigants in the Southern District of New York, which is a free legal clinic staffed by attorneys and paralegals to assist those who are representing themselves in civil lawsuits in this court. The clinic is run by a private organization; it is not part of, or run by, the Court. It cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any pro se party through the Pro Se Intake Unit. A copy of the flyer with details of the clinic is attached to this Order.

II. Conclusion The Clerk of Court is ordered to issue a summons for Sgt. Anthony, complete a USM-285 form with the address for this defendant, and deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all documents necessary to effect service on this defendant. The Court also directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this Order and a copy of the Complaint to the Corporation Counsel for the Village of Ossining, at: 16 Croton Avenue, Ossining, New York 10562. The Clerk of Court is also instructed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. Copies of an Amended Complaint form and NYLAG Clinic’s flyer are attached to this Order. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 14, 2023 White Plains, New York KENNETH M. KARAS United States District Judge DEFENDANT AND SERVICE ADDRESS Sgt. Anthony Village of Ossining Police Department Birdsall-Fagan Police Court Facility 86-88 Spring Street Ossining, New York 10562 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

_____CV_______________ Write the full name of each plaintiff. (Include case number if one has been assigned)

AMENDED -against- COMPLAINT (Prisoner) Do you want a jury trial? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Write the full name of each defendant. If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section IV.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. I. LEGAL BASIS FOR CLAIM State below the federal legal basis for your claim, if known. This form is designed primarily for prisoners challenging the constitutionality of their conditions of confinement; those claims are often brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (against state, county, or municipal defendants) or in a “Bivens” action (against federal defendants). ☐ Violation of my federal constitutional rights ☐ Other: II. PLAINTIFF INFORMATION Each plaintiff must provide the following information. Attach additional pages if necessary.

First Name Middle Initial Last Name

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lemon v. John Doe (1), (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Lemon v. John Doe (1) (Lemon v. John Doe (1)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)