Lemon v. Hong

Fourth Circuit

Lemon v. Hong

671 F. App'x 79

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2016·No. No. 16-1616·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arron Frederick Lemon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have [80] reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lemon v. Hong, No. 1:16-cv-00979-ELH, 2016 WL 2347976 (D. Md. May 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arron Frederick Lemon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have [80] reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lemon v. Hong, No. 1:16-cv-00979-ELH, 2016 WL 2347976 (D. Md. May 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Lemon v. Hong, 671 F. App'x 79 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 79 (Lemon v. Hong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related