Lemoine v. State

898 So. 2d 1158, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4475, 2005 WL 735893
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 1, 2005
DocketNo. 5D04-1022
StatusPublished

This text of 898 So. 2d 1158 (Lemoine v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lemoine v. State, 898 So. 2d 1158, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4475, 2005 WL 735893 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PALMER, J.

Donald E. Lemoine (defendant) appeals his sentence. Based on the State’s concession of error, we vacate the defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

The defendant entered pleas to the charges of engaging in sexual activity with a child and lewd and lascivious assault upon a child, and he was placed on probation therefor. He subsequently violated the terms of his probation and, as a result, the trial court sentenced him to a term of 17 years in the Department of Corrections. However, it is not clear from the sentencing documents whether a general sentence of 17 years’ imprisonment was imposed for both offenses or whether a term of 17 years’ imprisonment was to be imposed on each count. The State aptly acknowledges that the offense of lewd and lascivious assault upon a child is a second degree felony which authorized a maximum sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment at the time defendant committed the offense and, therefore, the defendant’s sentence on the lewd and lascivious assault charge is improper. The State also recognizes that [1159]*1159“general sentences” which impose a single sentence for multiple counts are improper. See Brazley v. State, 871 So.2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

We therefore vacate the defendant’s sentence on each conviction and remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to impose a separate sentence for each conviction, with the sentence for the second degree felony not to exceed 15 years.

Sentences VACATED and cause REMANDED for resentencing.

GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brazley v. State
871 So. 2d 986 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
898 So. 2d 1158, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4475, 2005 WL 735893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lemoine-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.