Lemle v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lemle v. State

469 S.W.3d 501, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 899, 2015 WL 5286459

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2015·No. No. ED 102480·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Alexander Lemle (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15¹ without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[502] sion to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Alexander Lemle (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15¹ without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[502] sion to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Lemle v. State, 469 S.W.3d 501, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 899, 2015 WL 5286459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

469 S.W.3d 501 (Lemle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.